Question

Need Help ASAP

How is refutation effective in an argument?

It proves a point without having to present evidence.
It makes the audience think the opposition is foolish.
It makes evidence look better than the opposition's by contrast.
It attacks the opposition's evidence, so it cannot prove its point.

Answer 1

which one is it b or c

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

the answer is B or C. refutation is proving the evidence presented (usually by other person) to be incorrect. which results in on lookers to think the other person is "foolish" and that your evidence and facts are better