Question

In 1920, the state of Georgia contained approximately 310,000 farms. By 2001, there were less than 50,000 farms in the entire state.

Which of these is a reasonable conclusion based on the information in the prompt?
A) People are eating less, so there is not as great of a need for farms in Georgia.
B) Universities no longer have programs involving agriculture, so fewer people farm.
C) Georgia gets most of its agricultural goods from countries like Japan and Vietnam.
D) The use of more technology in farming has decreased the need for having many smaller farms.

Answer 1

I believe that your answer would be D.

Answer 2

D) The use of more technology in farming has decreased the need for having many smaller farms.

Step-by-step explanation:

Georgia remained an agrarian state until after World War II (1941-45). The rustic populace did not diminish much between 1920, when there were 2.1 million provincial individuals and 310,000 homesteads, and 1960, when there were as yet 1.98 million country inhabitants. The extent of the populace living in provincial zones diminished from around 85 percent in 1900 to 37 percent by 1990.

Numerous components added to the reduction in Georgia's country populace. To start with, the Great Depression and U.S. president Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal programs disturbed the sharecropping framework, which was an expansive piece of Georgia's farming economy at the turn of the twentieth century. The Agricultural Adjustment Act, for instance, paid landowners not to plant certain yields, which diminished landowners' requirement for tenant farmers and expanded their capacity to purchase work sparing hardware. The rustic populace likewise diminished as manufacturing plants and urban focuses extended at a quick pace amid World War II, and as war veterans went to school on the GI Bill. These alumni either investigated nonagricultural vocations or grasped present day, industrialized horticulture with huge automated ranches.