asked 187k views
1 vote
Which was a provision of the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Scott v. Sandford case?

A) Enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.

B) Free African Americans could enjoy the same rights as other US citizens.

C) Slaveholders could only take enslaved workers into slave states or territories.

D) The Missouri Compromise was constitutional and should be upheld.

2 Answers

7 votes

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User VForce
by
7.8k points
3 votes

I believe the answer is: A. Enslaved people were property and did not have the right to file a suit.

At that time, Dred Scott wanted to sue the government for the mistreatment experienced by his family and demanded that both his wife and kids to be freed from slavery. The court ruled out that only citizens have the right to file a suit and see slaves as property that can never be a citizen.

answered
User NeverTrust
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.