asked 145k views
1 vote
Sir francis galton assumed that skull size is related to intelligence, this was _____ measure of intelligence.

asked
User Thizzer
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer;

A reliable, but not valid

Sir francis galton assumed that skull size is related to intelligence, this was a reliable but not a valid measure of intelligence.

Explanation;

-Intelligence reflects the ability to learn from experience, to acquire knowledge, to use resources effectively in adapting to new situations or solving problems, cannot me be measured directly.

-Test reliability and validity are highly desirable for an accurate assessment of intelligence. Also knowing that a test is reliable guarantees that it is also valid.

-It is possible to have reliability but lack validity at the same time, for instance; Sir Francis Galton assumed that skull size is related to intelligence, and he was able to measure skull size with great reliability. However, the measure of skull size was not valid simply because it had nothing to do with intelligence. In this case, then, we have reliability without validity


answered
User Okigan
by
8.7k points
5 votes
The answer that best fits the blank is "RELIABLE, BUT NOT A VALID". Sir Francis Galton is a known anthropologist and eugenicist, and for him, skull size in relation to intelligence might be reliable, but this do not have any evidence to be considered valid. 
answered
User BeeDog
by
7.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.