Question

Which accurately describes a contrast between Wiesel’s All Rivers Run to the Sea and Art Spiegelman’s graphic novel, Maus? Wiesel’s narrative is a nonfiction account of the Holocaust, whereas Spiegelman’s novel is a fictional account. Wiesel’s work relies on the memories of others, whereas Spiegelman’s account relies on the memories of one person. Wiesel’s story includes his thoughts and feelings, whereas Spiegelman’s novel illustrates his father’s horrific experiences. Wiesel’s writing is loosely based on his own experiences, whereas Spiegelman’s narrative is purely imaginative.

Answer 1

The primary contrast is between Elie Wiesel’s nonfiction memoir, which focuses on his personal Holocaust experiences, and Art Spiegelman’s nonfiction graphic novel that illustrates his father's experiences. Wiesel's work is introspective, whereas Spiegelman's conveys another's story through his own artistic lens.

Step-by-step explanation:

The contrast between Elie Wiesel’s All Rivers Run to the Sea and Art Spiegelman’s Maus lies in the nature of their narratives and the perspectives they represent. Wiesel’s account is a nonfiction memoir that details his own experiences and reflections during the Holocaust. In contrast, Spiegelman’s Maus is also nonfiction, but it adopts a graphic novel format and primarily relates the Holocaust experiences of Spiegelman's father, making it a personal narrative derived from another’s memories.

While Wiesel’s narrative includes his personal thoughts and feelings, giving it a profound introspective quality, Spiegelman employs visuals and dialogue to present a layered portrayal of his father’s horrific experiences. Neither work is fictional or purely imaginative; both are anchored in real-life events. The distinction is largely in the presentation and scope of personal recollection, with Wiesel’s work emanating directly from his own memory, while Spiegelman’s narrative weaves in his father’s memories with his own artistic interpretation.

Answer 2

C

Step-by-step explanation: