Question

In his veto of the Maysville Road bill (1830) and in his veto of the re-charter of the second Bank of the United States (1832), Jackson used the argument that the Constitution made no provision for federal support of roads or banks. The evidence above BEST supports the conclusion that Jackson was a(n) __________. A. isolationist B. strict constructionist C. sectionalist D. loose constructionist

Answer 1

Jackson's argument that the Constitution made no provision for federal support of roads or banks is a narrow interpretation of the constitution. so the ans is B. strict constructionist.

Answer 2

Question:

In his veto of the Maysville Road bill (1830) and in his veto of the re-charter of the second Bank of the United States (1832), Jackson used the argument that the Constitution made no provision for federal support of roads or banks. The evidence above BEST supports the conclusion that Jackson was a(n) __________. A. isolationist B. strict constructionist C. sectionalist D. loose constructionist

Answer:

A. isolationist