Question

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

Answer 1

Answer: The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.

Explanation: In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.

Answer 2

The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that