Question

Artur, who has a disability, is an employee of banquet & event facilities & services, inc. after the installation of new doors on the entrance to banquet's hall, artur finds it nearly impossible to enter and exit. for repeatedly failing to be on time, banquet replaces artur with carter, who does not have a disability. ​ refer to fact pattern 29-3. to succeed with a claim against banquet under the americans with disabilities act, artur will have to show that​

a. ​the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination.
b. artur is otherwise qualified for the employment in question.​
c. ​carter is unqualified for artur's position.
d. ​artur has received good performance evaluations in the past.

Answer 1

b. artur is otherwise qualified for the employment in question.​

Step-by-step explanation:

In order for ti to be a legal case and to have something to sue for, or to get his job back, Artur has to prove that if you do not take into consideration the fact of that door that is been causing artur troubles to enter and exit, he is well suited, prepared and that he is qualified for that employment, that would make the employer fall into the category of not making reasonable accomodation for him to work.

Answer 2

Answer: "a) the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination"

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all areas of public life including work. In the case of Artur, who put a claim against Banquet under the Americans with disabilities act, he has to show that the doors were installed as an act of intentional discrimination.