asked 27.0k views
2 votes
The Agricultural Revolution certainly enlarge the sum total of food at the disposal of humankind, but the extra food did not translate into a better diet or more leisure. Rather, it translated into population explosions and pampered elites. The average farmer worked harder than the average forager, and got a worse diet in return.

Which of the following evidence would best challenge the author's argument that agriculture resulted in a worse diet than foraging?

(A) comparing Paleolithic human bone size in Europe and in Africa.
(B) Data comparing the frequency of violet deaths in paleolithic populations to those in neolithic populations (as evidenced by skeletons with evidence of blunt force trauma).
(C) Data comparing average life expectancy in the Indus Valley 4,000 years ago to that of modern South Asians.

asked
User Mrfour
by
8.1k points

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Rachel Fong
by
8.0k points
6 votes

Answer:

(A) comparing Paleolithic human bone size in Europe and in Africa

answered
User Tijmenvdk
by
8.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.