Final answer:
The question asks about allocating processes to memory partitions using first-fit, best-fit, and worst-fit algorithms. The best-fit algorithm is generally the most efficient, although it can cause fragmentation. Each algorithm allocates processes differently based on the size of memory partitions and the order of allocation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of this question is the placement of processes in memory partitions using the first-fit, best-fit, and worst-fit algorithms in the context of operating systems in Computers and Technology.
First-Fit Algorithm
For the first-fit algorithm, the processes will be placed as follows:
- 212 KB in the 500 KB partition
- 417 KB in the 600 KB partition
- 112 KB in the 200 KB partition
- 426 KB cannot be placed as the remaining partitions are too small
Best-Fit Algorithm
For the best-fit algorithm, the processes would be placed like this:
- 212 KB in the 300 KB partition
- 417 KB in the 500 KB partition
- 112 KB in the remaining 200 KB partition
- 426 KB in the 600 KB partition
Worst-Fit Algorithm
For the worst-fit algorithm, the process placement would be:
- 212 KB in the 600 KB partition
- 417 KB in the 500 KB partition
- 112 KB in the 300 KB partition
- 426 KB cannot be placed as the remaining partitions are too small
In terms of the most efficient use of memory, the best-fit algorithm generally leaves the smallest leftover memory blocks, thereby making more efficient use of available memory compared to the first-fit and worst-fit algorithms, although it can lead to fragmentation issues over time.