asked 40.5k views
5 votes
Given that triangle PHT is a right triangle and Line HY is an altitude, what is the missing justification in the proof that (PH)^2 + (HT)^2 = (PT)^2?

Given that triangle PHT is a right triangle and Line HY is an altitude, what is the-example-1
Given that triangle PHT is a right triangle and Line HY is an altitude, what is the-example-1
Given that triangle PHT is a right triangle and Line HY is an altitude, what is the-example-2
asked
User Siti
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The correct option is D.

Explanation:

Given information: Triangle PHT is a right triangle and Line HY is an altitude.

According to the reflexive property, a side or an angle is congruent to itself.

If A is an angle of a triangle then using reflexive property


\angle A\cong \angle A


\angle PHT\cong \angle HYT (Both are right angles)


\angle T\cong \angle T (Reflexive property)


\triangle PHT\sim \triangle HYT (AA rule of similarity)

Other statements and reasons are present in the table.

The missing reason is reflexive property. Therefore the correct option is D.

answered
User Dgzz
by
8.4k points
3 votes

Answer: the answer is D

Explanation:

answered
User GooseSerbus
by
8.7k points