asked 225k views
2 votes
The question is: Shall we attempt to establish ourselves as a power in the far East and possess the Philippines for glory? . . . [I]f we take the Philippines . . . they will yield us nothing, and probably be a source of annual expense. Certainly they will be a grievous drain upon revenue if we consider the enormous army and navy which we shall be forced to maintain upon their account. . . .

Whether the United States maintain its present unique position of safety, or forfeit it through acquiring foreign possessions, is to be decided by its action in regard to the Philippines.

Why does Carnegie think that occupying the Philippines will cost the United States money?

It will hurt US trade with other parts of Asia.

It will cost too much to buy the islands from Spain.

It will require the United States to spend money to defend the islands.

asked
User Juanmah
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

1 vote

Answer:

the united states maintains its present

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Jarmo Pertman
by
8.3k points
5 votes

Answer:It will require the United States to spend money to defend the islands

Step-by-step explanation:

Carnegie thinks that occupying the Philippines will cost the United States money because It will make the United States spend money to protect the islands from foreign attacks.

In his quote he says that “Certainly they will be a grievous drain upon revenue if we consider the enormous army and navy which we shall be forced to maintain upon their account. . . .” A grievous drain upon revenue means that the taxpayers’ money will be destined or wasted in trying to keep an army and navy in such a far away place.

answered
User Draysams
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.