Question

Claim: It is more difficult to find out about the real King Arthur than the origin of his legend.

Which of the following supports the above claim?

A) "But, as skeptics have been quick to point out, nowhere does Glidas mention the name of Arthur."


B) "So goes the tale, as told by Geoffrey of Monmouth."


C) "The legend of King Arthur--in stark contrast to the actual man--is easy to track back to its origins."


D) "...but such is the nature of classic myths. They can transcend almost any sort of border; witness the revival of the legend in the twentieth century…"

Answer 1

C) "The legend of King Arthur--in stark contrast to the actual man--is easy to track back to its origins."

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

C - the legend of King Arthur - in stark contrast to the actual man - is easy to track bak to its orgins.

Both the claim and option C mention how much more difficult it is to know about the REAL King Arthur and how much easier it is to trace back the history of the legend.