asked 30.1k views
4 votes
What did Dred Scott argue in the Scott v. Sandford case?

He was free because he had lived in free states.
He was free because he was now a slaveholder.
He should not have been captured because he was a fugitive.
He should get his property back through due process.

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

He was free because he had lived in free states.

Step-by-step explanation:

I am in Junior High learning this. I did the quiz this was the answer.

answered
User SWilko
by
7.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.