asked 87.8k views
25 votes
Which of the following is a key difference between the cases of Gutter v. Bollinger and Hernandez v. Texas?

a)Pete Hernandez committed a crime, and Barbara Grutter was innocent.
b)Barbara Grutter was a woman, and Pete Hernandez was a man.
c)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld exclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced exclusion to promote diversity.
d)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity.

asked
User Gameover
by
8.6k points

2 Answers

4 votes


d)Grutter v. Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v. Texas denounced inclusion to promote diversity.
answered
User Qiao
by
8.5k points
8 votes

Answer:

the correct answer for this question is this one 'D.' Grutter v.Bollinger upheld inclusion to promote diversity, while Hernandez v.Texas denounced Inclusion to promote diversity...

this is the key difference between the cases of Grutter v.Bollinger and Hernandez v.Texas

answered
User Val Bonn
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.