asked 51.3k views
0 votes
Which statement best explains these two points of

view?
O Martin believed that the slave trade should be
considered constitutional, while Rutledge did not.
O Martin wanted to ban only the slave trade, while
Rutledge wanted to ban the practice of slavery
outright
O Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge
wanted to preserve the practice of importing
enslaved workers.
O Martin did not want to impose a tax on importing
enslaved workers, while Rutledge wanted to create
such a tax.

asked
User Subbdue
by
8.0k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

NORTHERN, SOUTHERN

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Elisha
by
8.6k points
5 votes

Answer: Martin opposed the slave trade, while Rutledge

wanted to preserve the practice of importing

enslaved workers.

Explanation: In the passage, Martin asks for a tax or prohibition (ban) on Slave trade, while the other argued that three states would never go along with that and "the expectation is vain".

answered
User Marthin
by
8.5k points