asked 193k views
2 votes
Ranger says the expression is not in its simplest form. He thinks the two terms need to be combined. Is Ranger right that 8x − 20 can be simplified further? Provide support for your response.

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer: Ranger is correct, because the expression is in simple form an it has no parenthesis or like terms.

Explanation:

answered
User WSkid
by
8.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

4(2x - 5)

Explanation:

Rewrite "20" as 4 * 5

Rewrite "8" as 4 * 2

=4 * 2x - 4 * 5

Factor out common term "4"

=4(2x - 5) <------ Your answer.

answered
User Nobrandheroes
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.