asked 37.6k views
0 votes
Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

the answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Jerard
by
7.7k points
2 votes

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Step-by-step explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.