Register

23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one? a. Gideon v. Wai…

23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one? a. Gideon v. Wai…
asked 146k views
0 votes
23. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a person accused of a serious crime

must be provided with an attorney if he or she was too poor to afford one?
a. Gideon v. Wainwright
b. Yates v. United States
C. Miranda v. Arizona
d. Roe v. Wade

asked
User Rosstified
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

a. Gideon v. Wainwright

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Simon Bull
by
7.9k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
Who made dutch claims in north america?
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!