asked 190k views
4 votes
What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. They both tried to explain evolution, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence. They both understood how mutations occurred, but Lamarck was able to support it with evidence.

asked
User Cadavre
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

They both tried to explain evolution, but Darwin was able to support it with evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps :)

answered
User PaolaG
by
8.7k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.