menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
When the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution is it sometimes, in effect, making new laws? Is such “activism” on the part of the Supreme Court part of its job?
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
When the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution is it sometimes, in effect, making new laws? Is such “activism” on the part of the Supreme Court part of its job?
asked
Mar 20, 2021
99.1k
views
3
votes
When the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution is it sometimes, in effect, making new laws? Is such “activism” on the part of the Supreme Court part of its job?
History
college
Timfaber
asked
by
Timfaber
8.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
1
vote
Answer:
Yes, when the US Supreme Court interprets the US Constitution, it sometimes, in effect, make new laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The provision that gives Supreme Court the power to interpret the constitution is called Judicial Activism.
Through this provision, the Supreme Court can interpret the US Constitution and the laws contained in it according to the need of the situation.
The Supreme Court may invalidate any legislative decision or executive order through Judicial Activism. Making such “activism” is on the part of the Supreme Court job.
GO VEGAN
answered
Mar 25, 2021
by
GO VEGAN
9.1k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Apr 16, 2024
135k
views
When a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues, it is engaging in: a) Judicial restraint b) Judicial activism c) Precedent setting d) Court
Alex Moreno
asked
Apr 16, 2024
by
Alex Moreno
7.9k
points
Law
college
1
answer
3
votes
135k
views
asked
Oct 8, 2017
222k
views
Explain the concept of judicial activism and how this philosophy interprets the constitution??????
Hdomos
asked
Oct 8, 2017
by
Hdomos
8.4k
points
History
high-school
2
answers
2
votes
222k
views
asked
Feb 12, 2018
153k
views
Compare judicial activism with judicial restraint, including how each philosophy interprets the Constitution. Explain at least one example of each.
Jleuleu
asked
Feb 12, 2018
by
Jleuleu
8.0k
points
History
college
2
answers
3
votes
153k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty