asked 55.5k views
1 vote
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

That contained suspects must be informed of their rights

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Pkumarn
by
7.6k points
0 votes

Answer:

Guilty.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

answered
User Hertzi
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.