menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Which of the following best describes the signifWhich statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?icance of the in re Gault case?
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
Which of the following best describes the signifWhich statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?icance of the in re Gault case?
asked
Feb 6, 2021
217k
views
1
vote
Which of the following best describes the signifWhich statement explains the significance of the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona?icance of the in re Gault case?
History
college
Ethangui
asked
by
Ethangui
8.4k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
2
Answers
3
votes
Answer:
could you post the question again its kinda confusing
Step-by-step explanation:
Morteza Mashayekhi
answered
Feb 9, 2021
by
Morteza Mashayekhi
8.2k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
1
vote
Add the number two times, then divide it by 140.
Karmen
answered
Feb 13, 2021
by
Karmen
7.9k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Feb 19, 2024
19.7k
views
Which Supreme Court ruling asserted that juveniles have the right to be convicted only if there is proof beyond a reasonable doubt? A) Miranda v. Arizona B) In re Gault C) In re Winship D) Brown v. Board
Kyle Pittman
asked
Feb 19, 2024
by
Kyle Pittman
8.3k
points
Law
college
1
answer
3
votes
19.7k
views
asked
Oct 10, 2024
27.2k
views
Which legal precedent case is an example of a judgment on a case of excessive interrogation tactics by police directed toward juvenile offenders? a) Miranda v. Arizona b) In re Gault c) Terry v. Ohio d)
Hsop
asked
Oct 10, 2024
by
Hsop
7.9k
points
Law
college
1
answer
0
votes
27.2k
views
asked
Dec 18, 2024
78.8k
views
Which case ruled that evidence seized without probable cause and without a proper search warrant was inadmissible in court? A. Gideon v. Wainwright B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Mapp v. Ohio D. In re Gault
Gavin Ward
asked
Dec 18, 2024
by
Gavin Ward
8.6k
points
Law
college
1
answer
0
votes
78.8k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty