asked 183k views
2 votes
What was Sandford's argument against setting Scott free?

A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process.

B. Scott now lived in Missouri where slavery was legal.

C. The owners had purchased Scott legally, so they should be able to take him where they
wished.​

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Maria Vill
by
7.9k points
2 votes

Answer is A Scott was property and could not be taken away without due process

answered
User Noober
by
8.8k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.