Question

Juror #3 was easily the most vocal proponent of the defendant's guilt. When he

was left as the only juror voting "guilty", he tried to hold his ground, but he
eventually broke down in a gut-wrenching scene at the end of the film. It
transpired that he was holding on to the idea that the defendant was guilty
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary because of a deep resentment
he was harboring against a different person altogether. Who was Juror #3 really
angry with?
O
Juror #8
O
His son
O
His father
O
The defendant's mother

Answer 1

The defendants mother because he can’t be mad at his son or dad and he can’t be mad at himself the defendants mother would make the most sense