Register

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago The fossils h…

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago The fossils h…
asked 211k views
3 votes
What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?

It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

asked
User ShaneQful
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes
It is from the Edicaran Period
answered
User Boris Barroso
by
8.4k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Ashey
asked Jan 23, 2019 55.4k views
The earliest animals on earth probably arose from colonial protists, so what does the body plan of the sponges suggest?
Ashey asked Jan 23, 2019
by Ashey
8.4k points
1 answer
5 votes
55.4k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

Which of the objects is living or nonliving: Bacteria, virus, moss, you, a lemon seed, the air, bread, lettuce and rocks?
What are three important types of forces
Two methods of active transport
Link Copied!