Answer:
The bracero program grew out of a series of bi-lateral agreements between Mexico and the 
United States that allowed millions of Mexican men to come to the United States to work on, 
short-term, primarily agricultural labor contracts. From 1942 to 1964, 4.6 million contracts were 
signed, with many individuals returning several times on different contracts, making it the 
largest U.S. contract labor program. An examination of the images, stories, documents and 
artifacts of the bracero program contributes to our understanding of the lives of migrant 
workers in Mexico and the United States, as well as our knowledge of, immigration, citizenship, 
nationalism, agriculture, labor practices, race relations, gender, sexuality, the family, visual 
culture, and the Cold War era. 
The bracero program was controversial in its time. Mexican nationals, desperate for work, were 
willing to take arduous jobs at wages scorned by most Americans. Farm workers already living 
in the United States worried that braceros would compete for jobs and lower wages. In theory, 
the bracero program had safeguards to protect both Mexican and domestic workers for 
example, guaranteed payment of at least the prevailing area wage received by native workers; 
employment for three-fourths of the contract period; adequate, sanitary, and free housing; 
decent meals at reasonable prices; occupational insurance at employer's expense; and free 
transportation back to Mexico at the end of the contract. Employers were supposed to hire 
braceros only in areas of certified domestic labor shortage, and were not to use them as 
strikebreakers. In practice, they ignored many of these rules and Mexican and native workers 
suffered while growers benefited from plentiful, cheap, labor. Between the 1940s and mid 
1950s, farm wages dropped sharply as a percentage of manufacturing wages, a result in part of 
the use of braceros and undocumented laborers who lacked full rights in American society.
The U.S. turned to Mexico as a supplier of labour.Mexico doubted that a legitimate labor scarcity 
existed and viewed the Bracero program as a way 
for the U.S. to obtain cheap labor. 
 Mexican officials were concerned about the 
deportation and repatriation of Mexicans which 
occurred in the 1930’s and were anxious to 
prevent another such episode. 
 Mexico did not want to permit their workers to be 
sent to discrimination prone states in the U.S. 
 Mexico felt that there might be a danger to 
Mexico's economic development if many 
thousands of their workers left for the U.S
Explanation: