Question

GEOGRAPHY:
Are primary impacts worse than secondary impacts (of an earthquake)?

Answer 1

In terms of damage, primary effects were a lot more severe but secondary effects aren't as significant due to the majority of the damage taking place from the actual earthquake.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Answer:No, secondary impacts are much worse than primary impacts of an earthquake.

Explanation: The primary impacts are the direct effect of the disaster and it's the main part of the disaster. The secondary impacts are caused by the effects of the primary impacts. Most times, the secondary effects of earthquakes are much worse because they are the aftermath of the primary impacts with tend to be much more devastating.