Question

Nevada passed a law banning all commercial billboards along state highways to improve the appearance of the environment. If this law were to be challenged, which of the following would a court examine to determine if the law is constitutional?a. It would have to be established that the law furthers an interest of the state of Nevada to create a more aesthetically pleasing environment.b. It would have to be shown that the law directly and materially advances the state's goal of a more aesthetically pleasing environment.c. It would have to be shown that the law reaches no further than necessary to promote thestate goal.d. All of the above.

Answer 1

D) All of the above.

Step-by-step explanation:

The challengers of the law (not the State of Nevada) would need to prove any of the three statements:

• that the law doesn't help to create a more aesthetically pleasing environment.
• that the law doesn't directly and materially help the state to advance in its goal of improving the aesthetics of the environment.
• that the law over-reaches its original goal of promoting a more aesthetically pleasing environment.