asked 94.5k views
3 votes
"In the case of ____________________, the Supreme Court held that a defendant's decision not to testify during the trial cannot be held against him or her.​

asked
User Demetri
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

The possible answers for this question are:

a. Adamson v. California

b. Batson v. Kentucky

c. J.E.B. v. Alabama

d. Swain v. Alabama

The correct answer is:

a. Adamson v. California

Step-by-step explanation:

For the Supreme Court, according to the fifth Amendment, in this case Adamson, who had been convicted by the state of California for being guilty of first degree murder, had the right to omit his testimony against himself.

Basically, the fifth amendment of the constitution of the United States of America states that an individual would be protected against self-incrimination.

answered
User Mukesh M
by
8.1k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.