asked 116k views
2 votes
Which of these would NOT have been a benefit of interchangeable parts? *

A) Broken machines would be easier to fix

B) Goods that required assembly could be mass produced

C) Goods would have to be completely replaced if one part broke

D) All parts were made exactly the same

asked
User Xiu Shi
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason exactly why it would be D because since all of the parts are the same there in never going to be a reason for to to be a interchangeable part

answered
User Barrel Roll
by
7.4k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.