asked 119k views
4 votes
Why did Hamilton say that a Bill of Rights was not necessary to be added to the Constitution? A) The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people. B) The Bill of Rights were already ample and of a precise manner within the convention. C) Great Britain had a Bill of Rights under which many were born under and had protection. D) The people had natural rights that could not be taken away by the government.

asked
User Theva
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Answer is A, "The national and state constitutions were already a bill of rights guaranteed by the people."

answered
User Bhavya Shaktawat
by
8.1k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.