Register

The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain there slaves could suit for their freedom slaves had rights according to the Constitution…

The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain there slaves could suit for their freedom slaves had rights according to the Constitution…
asked 120k views
2 votes
The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain there slaves could suit for their freedom slaves had rights according to the Constitution slaves were property and had no Constitutional rights.​

The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain-example-1
asked
User JBibbs
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

10 votes

Answer:

D. Slaves were property and had no Constitutional rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Oliver Robie
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Bhadra
asked Apr 7, 2024 158k views
Who was Dred Scott? a. an escaped enslaved person b. a person seeking freedom c. an army officer
Bhadra asked Apr 7, 2024
by Bhadra
7.7k points
1 answer
5 votes
158k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Link Copied!