asked 179k views
2 votes
Help! ASAP!

The answer choices are:

A- Cai are used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

B- Cai only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion

C- Cai established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion.

D- Cai used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

Help! ASAP! The answer choices are: A- Cai are used an invalid reason to justify the-example-1

1 Answer

3 votes

9514 1404 393

Answer:

A- Cai are used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

Explanation:

In step 4, Cai referred to the angles as "alternate interior." In fact, they are "corresponding." The reason used to justify congruence of the angles was invalid.

answered
User Sherann
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.