Question

Which of the following statements correctly describes the significance of the case? (4 points) In Roe v. Wade, the right of women to vote and work for wages was ruled protected by the Fourth Amendment. In Mapp v. Ohio, the reading of rights to a criminal suspect was ruled protected through the Sixth Amendment. In Miranda v. Arizona, suspects must be informed of their rights under the Fifth Amendment. In Gideon v. Wainwright, the protection against illegal search and seizure was upheld according to the Fifth Amendment.

Answer 1

Roe v Wade is about abortion, Mapp v Ohio is unlawful search and seizure, Texas v Johnson is flag burning, and Gideon v Wainwright is to provide an attorney. So it's actually Texas v Johnson.