A thief sold some stolen goods to a dealer. Several weeks later, the police raided the dealer's store and arrested him. In this raid, the police seized the goods the thief sold to the dealer and a record book in which the dealer had recorded this transaction. However, at the dealer's subsequent trial for receiving stolen goods, the charges against him were dismissed when the court ruled that the search warrant had been improperly issued.
The police were able to trace the stolen goods to the thief because of fingerprint identification and the information contained in the dealer's record book.
At his trial, the thief made a motion to suppress the stolen goods and record book.
What should the judge do?