Question

Question 1 of 10

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

A. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

B. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions

C. When it is written by an academic professional

D. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event directly

Answer 1

it is b

Step-by-step explanation:

trust breh d is wrong

Answer 2

It is d because you cannot be sure as the person who has written has not been there so you don't know if they are telling the truth or exaggerating the event