Register

This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this form that contains the integer 2. Why?

This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this form that contains the integer 2. Why?
asked 15.1k views
2 votes
This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this form that contains the integer 2. Why?

This relationship leads to the conclusion that there is no Pythagorean triple of this-example-1
asked
User Siva
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes
Is there a shape to look at ?
answered
User Hien
by
8.1k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

No related questions found

Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.

Categories

Other Questions

How do you can you solve this problem 37 + y = 87; y =
What is .725 as a fraction
How do you estimate of 4 5/8 X 1/3
Link Copied!