menu
Qamnty
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
The Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona established rights for citizens who are accused of a crime. What is the purpose of giving rights to citizens accused of a crime? ОА. Th…
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Ask a Question
The Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona established rights for citizens who are accused of a crime. What is the purpose of giving rights to citizens accused of a crime? ОА. Th…
asked
Oct 28, 2022
83.4k
views
0
votes
The Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona established rights for citizens who are accused of a crime. What is the purpose of
giving rights to citizens accused of a crime?
ОА.
The person has a better chance to receive justice
ОВ. .
The government looks like it cares for its citizens
C.
People must have rights or they lose all sense of hope.
OD
It decreases the number or people that are in prison.
History
college
Mawia
asked
by
Mawia
7.7k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
2
votes
Answer:
The person has a better chance to receive justice.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sam YC
answered
Nov 4, 2022
by
Sam YC
8.5k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Jul 27, 2024
152k
views
Which decision by the Warren Court determined that the state must provide a lawyer to a person accused of a crime who cannot afford one? A. Reynolds’s v. Sims B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Gideon v. Wainwright
Slava V
asked
Jul 27, 2024
by
Slava V
7.1k
points
History
high-school
1
answer
3
votes
152k
views
asked
Nov 24, 2024
87.5k
views
Under Miranda v. Arizona, when must Miranda warnings be given? 1) Before an arrest is made 2) During a trial 3) After a conviction 4) When anyone is in custody by a government agent accused of a crime
Susheel Karam
asked
Nov 24, 2024
by
Susheel Karam
7.7k
points
Law
college
1
answer
1
vote
87.5k
views
asked
Jun 15, 2017
228k
views
In miranda v. arizona, which amendments did the supreme court rule were violated? user: which of the following amendments is not as relevant to those who are accused of a crime but not yet proven guilty?
Puchacz
asked
Jun 15, 2017
by
Puchacz
8.7k
points
History
high-school
1
answer
0
votes
228k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.
Categories
All categories
Mathematics
(3.7m)
History
(955k)
English
(903k)
Biology
(716k)
Chemistry
(440k)
Physics
(405k)
Social Studies
(564k)
Advanced Placement
(27.5k)
SAT
(19.1k)
Geography
(146k)
Health
(283k)
Arts
(107k)
Business
(468k)
Computers & Tech
(195k)
French
(33.9k)
German
(4.9k)
Spanish
(174k)
Medicine
(125k)
Law
(53.4k)
Engineering
(74.2k)
Other Questions
What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qamnty