asked 53.7k views
3 votes
Please assist me with this two column proof. Part 1A



Please assist me with this two column proof. Part 1A ​-example-1

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

Answer is in the step by step explanation

Explanation:

Since we are given parallel lines, we know <BCA is congruent to <DAC because of alternate interior angles

Then AC is congruent to AC, that's reflexive prop

Now we have SAS, so Tri. ABC cong to tri. CDA,

Then you're done

answered
User Cowboy
by
7.9k points
2 votes

Answer:

Explanation:

BC = AD Given

<BCA = <CAD Alternate interior angles of parallel lines cut by a transversal.

AC = AC That's the reflexive property. A line is equal to itself

Triangle BCA = Triangle CAD SAS

Notice that the angle is included inside the two lines that define it (the angle). That's a very important consideration when using SAS. SAA doesn't always work. You can draw exceptions. SAS has no exceptions. It always works.

answered
User Blarg
by
7.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.