Final answer:
Paul McLean would likely consider actors as artists because acting is a disciplined, creative, and emotive form of expression that resonates with the intrinsic traits of artistry.
Step-by-step explanation:
The involvement in theatrical performances, the utilization of various acting methods, and the collaboration in production all underline the artistry of acting.
Paul McLean, though not specifically mentioned in the references, would likely consider actors as artists, given the broader context of performance and creation in theater. Acting requires a high level of creativity, training, and the ability to convey complex emotions and stories to the audience, which aligns with the fundamental traits of an artist. For instance, actors employ various techniques and aesthetics, such as the Suzuki/Viewpoint method mentioned in the production of Macbeth, to enhance their performance and convey deeper meanings.