asked 93.3k views
2 votes
Below is the graph of f’(×), the derivative of f(x), and has x-intercepts at x =-3, x = 1, and x = 2 and a relative maximum at x = -1.5 and a relative minimum at x = 1.5.Which of the following statement is false?

Below is the graph of f’(×), the derivative of f(x), and has x-intercepts at x =-3, x-example-1

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Option 1:

Explanation:

In order for f(x) to be concave up in an interval, the graph of the derivative would have to be increasing in that interval.

In the given graph, from x=-1.5 to x=1.5, the graph of the derivative is decreasing, therefore, the statement that "f is concave up from x=-1.5 to x=1.5" is false.

Next, for f to have an inflection point at any x-value the slope of the derivative, f'(x) must change signs at that x-value. Therefore, the statement "f has an inflection point at x=1.5" is true.

Finally, for f(x) to have a relative minimum at x=2, the value of the derivative must be 0, which is as seen on the graph.

Therefore, the first option is False.

answered
User Nikkatsa
by
7.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.