Answer:
There are several reasons why Edo may have been a better site for a capital in the 17th century than Kyoto. Edo was more centrally located than Kyoto, making it easier to govern the country. It also had a large population and a thriving economy, which made it a more attractive destination for merchants and traders. Finally, Edo was less vulnerable to attack than Kyoto, which made it a safer place to live.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps!