asked 51.5k views
1 vote
A historian attempting to corroborate a source should:

A. write a secondary source using information from a primary
source.
B. determine whether the source was written recently.
C. identify other sources that make similar conclusions.
D. explain why the source should not be trusted in the future.

asked
User Message
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer: The correct answer is to "Identify other sources that make similar conclusions."

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Kush Kella
by
7.4k points
3 votes
Answer: C. Identify other sources that make similar conclusions.

Step-by-step explanation:
Corroborate means to find support for. With this in mind, if you want your source to be supported by other sources, you should find other sources that support the claims and conclusions of your source.
answered
User Andrew Gustar
by
7.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.