asked 209k views
19 votes
In Schmerber v. California, the Court said that a search warrant was not necessary because _____.

the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety


the suspect’s privacy rights cannot be violated


the officer did not have time to secure a warrant


the suspect’s blood was drawn in a safe way

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

The officer did not have time to secure a warrant

Step-by-step explanation:

answered
User Nico Brenner
by
8.3k points
Welcome to Qamnty — a place to ask, share, and grow together. Join our community and get real answers from real people.