Answer:
Julius will likely be more upset than Edgar based on the principles of counterfactual reasoning. Counterfactual reasoning involves thinking about what might have happened if circumstances were different. In this scenario:
- Edgar, being the last person in line, might not engage in as much counterfactual thinking because there was no one behind him. He was already in the least favorable position to get a ticket, so there is less room for him to imagine how things could have gone differently.
- Julius, on the other hand, was directly behind the person who got the last ticket. He was in a more favorable position, just one person away from getting a ticket. Counterfactual reasoning will likely lead him to think about how close he was to getting a ticket and what might have happened if he had arrived slightly earlier or if the person in front of him had not purchased a ticket. This "almost there" feeling can make him more upset because he was very close to achieving his goal.
In essence, the disappointment experienced by Julius may be more intense because he can easily imagine how close he was to success, while Edgar was already in the least favorable position from the start. This highlights the role of counterfactual thinking in shaping emotional reactions to outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation: