Answer:
Appointing a dictator during times of crisis can have a number of negative consequences, including the abuse of power, suppression of dissent, violation of human rights, economic mismanagement, and instability. These problems can make it more difficult to resolve the crisis itself, as dictators are often more interested in consolidating their own power than in solving the problems facing their country.
While there may be some short-term benefits to appointing a dictator, such as a quick and decisive response to the crisis, the long-term costs are often too high. Dictators often become corrupt and authoritarian, and their regimes can lead to violence, conflict, and economic hardship.
It is important to weigh the risks and benefits carefully before appointing a dictator during times of crisis. In most cases, there are better alternatives, such as a democratically elected government or a temporary military junta.