Final answer:
The U.S. Congress, aiming to tackle terrorism and avoid American casualties, has generally supported an increase in drone strikes. This strategy aligns with U.S. foreign policy perspectives of neoconservatism and selective engagement.
Step-by-step explanation:
In response to increasing threats of terrorism and the need to minimize American casualties, the U.S. Congress has largely supported an increase in drone strikes. This outcome is attributed to the significant technological advancement of drones, which allows precise strikes against terrorist targets, thus bypassing the need for direct combat and possibly risking American lives. The predilection towards drone usage aligns with neoconservatism, a perspective of U.S. foreign policy whereby the nation may unilaterally deal with threats to its security, even within the boundaries of another sovereign nation. Additionally, this strategy is consistent with the selective engagement policy employed in recent years, which seeks to minimize direct intervention while achieving strategic security objectives.
Learn more about Drone Strikes