Question

people who disagree with stevens�s view on the rights protected under the second amendment could cite which of the following supreme court cases to support their argument? District of Columbia v. Heller Brown v. Board of Education Roe v. Wade Marbury v. Madison

Answer 1

The Supreme Court case that could be used to challenge Stevens's view on the Second Amendment is District of Columbia v. Heller. This case affirmed an individual's right to possess firearms for lawful purposes, such as self-defense at home, but did not rule out regulation or limits on these rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

People who disagree with Stevens's view on the rights protected under the Second Amendment could cite the case of District of Columbia v. Heller. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. This does not mean that Second Amendment rights are unlimited or not subject to regulation. However, it does provide a legal basis for arguing that these rights extend beyond what Stevens has interpreted.

Learn more about Second Amendment