Answer:
The rich nobility owned nearly all of the land, and the peasants worked on it.
Step-by-step explanation:
During the time period mentioned, Europe experienced a stark contrast in land ownership and labor. The wealthy nobility held the majority of the land, while the poor peasants had limited ownership. Here's a breakdown of the two scenarios: 1. The poor peasants owned and worked on their own land: In certain regions of Europe, some poor peasants did own and cultivate their land. They were responsible for tilling the soil, planting crops, and reaping the harvest on their own property. These peasants typically had small plots of land and subsisted through their agricultural activities. They might have lived in small, self-sufficient communities, relying on their own produce to sustain themselves. 2. The rich nobility owned nearly all of the land, and the peasants worked: Contrastingly, in many areas of Europe, the wealthy nobility owned the majority of the land. Peasants, who made up the majority of the population, worked on the nobles' lands as serfs or tenants. Serfs were bound to the land they worked on and were obligated to provide labor, pay rent, or offer a portion of their crops to the nobles. Tenants, on the other hand, had more flexibility but still had to pay rent or provide labor to the landowners. In both scenarios, agriculture played a significant role in the economy and society of medieval Europe. The nobility profited from the labor of the peasants, while the peasants struggled with limited rights and opportunities. This system of land ownership and labor contributed to the social and economic inequalities of the time.